Blog Post

The Real Estate Cycle - A Tale of Two Countries

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • Mar 29, 2024
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we explore the stages of the real estate cycle, focusing on the multifamily asset class, and compare the very different positioning between the United States and Canada within this cycle. Let’s explore this tale of two countries!

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, … it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair …”


- Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities, 1859


Cliché? Yes. Does it aptly describe the current real estate environment? Yes.

For multifamily investors in many US submarkets, where residential vacancy rates are over 10%, things may be feeling ‘wintery’. But for investors in Canadian markets who are looking down the barrel of an unprecedented wave of demand and constrained supply, it should feel like spring. Why doesn’t it? 


In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we explore the stages of the real estate cycle, focusing on the multifamily asset class, and compare the very different positioning between the United States and Canada within this cycle. Let’s explore this tale of two countries!


The Real Estate Cycle


Dr. Glenn Mueller, a professor at the University of Denver, developed a simple model for the real estate cycle that provides a useful starting point for analysis. His real estate cycle model is separated into 4 phases and 16 points, as follows:


There are patterns associated with each phase of the real estate cycle, and while this article will provide a cursory overview, a more detailed review is covered in Dr. Mueller’s most recent real estate market cycle monitor report:

Phase 1 – Recovery

The market is in a state of oversupply, either from previous new construction or negative demand growth. Point 1 is generally where new supply from the previous cycle stops coming online and new building stops or is massively curtailed. This phase continues as demand slowly absorbs oversupply.

Phase 2 – Expansion

As supply begins to tighten, rents begin to rise and reach a level that makes development and investment cost-feasible (Point 8). Capital flows into real estate to take advantage of favourable rents and price appreciation. Demand continues to outstrip supply, gradually pushing rents and occupancy higher until equilibrium is reached.


Phase 3 – Hypersupply
Categorized by supply growth rising above demand growth. Very often, market participants don’t immediately recognize it as rent growth and occupancy rates remain above long-term averages.  As participants confirm the trend, new capital inflow and construction halts or drastically slows.


Phase 4 – Recession
Due to the long lead time in real estate, markets have limited ability to react to new information and projects continue to come online for a period, widening the oversupply gap. Rents and occupancy fall as landlords compete for occupancy. The cycle reaches a trough when completions cease, or demand begins to grow at a rate higher than the new supply being added to the market.

With a description of the cycle itself out of the way, you probably have some inklings of where both the US and Canada are currently at within this cycle.

A Tale of Two Countries


Canada


In 2023, Canada saw the highest population growth rate since 1957 (3.2%), record low vacancy rates (1.5%) and record high rental growth rates (8.0%) in multifamily rental properties (CMHC Rental Market Report, January 2024), with these rates being even more extreme in Toronto and Vancouver.  These factors point to Canada being in the “Expansion” phase of the market cycle, where the typical outcome is an influx of capital and development until an equilibrium is reached.


To understand why this hasn’t happened, investors need to consider both the supply and demand sides of the equation.


Demand


Demand in Canada is almost entirely driven by permanent and temporary immigration, which accounts for 97.6% of population growth in Canada (Statistics Canada, March 27 2024). That report states, “Most of Canada's 3.2% population growth rate stemmed from temporary immigration in 2023. Without temporary immigration, that is, relying solely on permanent immigration and natural increase (births minus deaths), Canada's population growth would have been almost three times less (+1.2%).”

While the Federal Government has given clear indication that it intends to continue with its planned levels of permanent immigration (485,000 people in 2024 and 500,000 in 2025 and 2026, 2024-2026 Immigration Levels Plan), the same cannot be said for temporary immigration. Immigration Minister Marc Miller recently signaled the Ministry’s intention to reduce the proportion of non-permanent residents to 5% of the population by 2027, which will mean a reduction of ~525,000 people from the current pool of 2.66M non-permanent residents in Canada.


Using this information and data from Statistics Canada (Table 17-10-0040-01), we can create a simplistic model to forecast population growth through 2027:

1 Statistics Canada. Table 17-10-0009-01  Population estimates, quarterly


This simple model serves to show that if stated immigration policy holds, Canada will likely be entering a 4-year period of below average population growth.

Additionally, since non-permanent residents have been prohibited from purchasing property since January 1, 2023 (with exceptions, source), that population being reduced should have an oversized impact on cooling demand in the rental market in particular.


Supply

Despite governments at every level and the development community agreeing that we are in a housing crisis, the number of housing starts went down in 2023 compared to 2022, from 240,590 to 223,513 (CMHC).

There are 4 primary constraints that have prevented developers from being able to quickly respond to the demand shock that sent rent and occupancy rates rocketing:


  1. High land, interest, and building costs.
  2. Scarcity of economically viable land for development (ALR and Crown land is locked up).
  3. Comparatively slow entitlement and permitting processes. There are welcome attempts in many jurisdictions to improve this, though we have a long way to go.
  4. Even if projects get approved and funded, Canada doesn’t have sufficient construction and trades workforce to aggressively increase supply.

What this means for Canada


Looking purely at Canada’s rent and occupancy rate growth, one might expect investment dollars to be pouring into real estate and new buildings to be popping up like dandelions in the Spring, but a deeper dive reveals that investment conditions aren’t as attractive as they look on the outside.


Since costs are so high, the investment case for multifamily in Canada is highly dependent on increasing rents and asset prices. Canada already has comparatively expensive housing, and with a period of below-average population growth on the horizon, we believe that the current ‘expansion’ indicators are unlikely to lead to continued high rent growth and low vacancy.


There are attractive development projects in Canada, though it's not the majority of deals and in our view, savvy investors ought to be paying particularly close attention to whether projects are forecasting continued high rent growth or price appreciation to justify their returns. Even in a tight market, the high costs of development and potentially slowing demand have us skeptical that we will see the uptick in development and investment that Canada sorely needs.

The United States

Unlike Canada, most submarkets in the US are somewhere in the Hypersupply and Recession phases.  According to CoStar data, the US saw 583,000 multi-family units completed in 2023 (a 40-year high), with another 460,000 units anticipated for completion in 2024 (source). The full year absorption of units in 2023 was 315,000, meaning that the US saw an oversupply of 268,000 units nationally.


While the below chart from Dr. Mueller shouldn’t be used in isolation to determine the positioning of any individual submarkets, it does give a strong sense of where most U.S. urban centres are at in the real estate cycle:

Consistent with these findings, in most markets that we follow, there are very few new projects being started and there continues to be a glut of supply that is coming online.

In some markets, rent growth is still positive but declining, and in others, occupancy has dropped like a rock and rent growth is clearly negative. (For analysis on the Dallas-Fort Worth and Phoenix markets specifically, check out our recent webinar with CoStar.)

It’s not all doom and gloom though. Compared to Canada, it’s nice to see the cycle playing out in a more natural fashion, such that once demand absorbs excess supply, we fully anticipate seeing exciting investment opportunities. In the interim, two strategies worth looking at are investment in those markets near equilibrium, where the data clearly shows strong demand and limited supply moving forward.  Alternatively, should assets come up at fire sale prices in Recession markets, there could be interesting opportunities as the next cycle begins.


Conclusion


While Canada and the US are at very different places in the real estate cycle, there are barriers in both countries that limit investment attractiveness.


Canada desperately needs housing and is theoretically in a strong position for investment, though it is challenged by the question of how high prices can go before it materially affects demand. In our view, investors should be looking to invest with developers whose systems and processes give them an edge in driving profit, such that even if rent growth is modest, investors can achieve solid returns.


Most markets in the United States likely need 1-2 years before the next cycle begins in earnest, though we are seeing interesting opportunities in some markets that look to be nearer the equilibrium point, and we are keeping our eye out for distress pricing in recession markets.


SUBSCRIBE TO THE BIRD'S EYE VIEW

Budget Beat: Insights for Real Estate Investors

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 27 Apr, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide summaries and commentary on federal budget initiatives through the lens of private real estate investment. We focus on items that have seen less commentary from media, such as the potential freeze of development cost charge increases in communities over 300,000 population, and the Public Lands for Homes Plan, parts of the recently released Solving the Housing Crisis: Canada’s Housing Plan .

BC Multiplex Strategy - A Look Under the Hood

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 21 Feb, 2024
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we aim to improve on the traditional experience of looking under the hood by giving you a guided tour of the multiplex development strategy in BC, which has gained momentum following BCs recent housing legislation changes.

Where’s the Opportunity in Private Real Estate in 2024?

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 19 Jan, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we highlight 3 strategies within private real estate that we think will offer opportunities for superior risk-adjusted returns in 2024, and share our thoughts on why.

Ho Ho Housing Crisis - What’s in the Government’s bag of legislative gifts

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 16 Dec, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide a summary of 7 different amendments to housing law (one federal change, and six provincial changes), and share our thoughts on how we think these changes will impact investors.

Making Sense of Negative Cap Rate Spreads

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 25 Nov, 2023
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we cover what cap rates are, their relationship with interest rates, then dive into why seeing negative cap rate spreads is so strange.

A Deep Dive on Rental Growth Rates

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 20 Sep, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we take you on a deeper dive through both the art and science of one of these variables: rental rate growth.

Profiting in the Energy Efficiency Era

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 19 Aug, 2023
Government plays a massive role in the supply and demand equation for housing. From the Federal down to Municipal governments, there are dozens of policies that affect housing. As an investor, you don’t need a deep understanding of the policies themselves, though you do want to understand the effects these policies have. This edition of the Bird’s Eye View will look at BC’s Energy Step Code program, outline how it is affecting development in BC, and conclude with how investors can best position themselves as governments march toward ‘net-zero’ housing. While this article focuses on BC, the trend of requiring more energy efficient housing appears to have some degree of national traction, and we anticipate that these types of policies will become more common in all Provinces, though the specifics will likely differ. BC Energy Step Code In BC, the Provincial Government’s plan to increase the energy efficiency of newly built, and renovated buildings, is called the “BC Energy Step Code”. Developers need to get into the weeds and work with “energy advisors” to review plans, model energy consumption, and ultimately, ensure that certain energy efficiency thresholds are met. As investors, what you need to know is that today, all new buildings in BC must be 20% more energy efficient than they were required to be in 2018. By 2027, that number will be 40%, and by 2032, a whopping 80%, where new buildings will be “net-zero energy ready”. However, municipalities may choose to implement these timelines even sooner. Some municipalities, such as Richmond, Surrey, North Vancouver and West Vancouver, have already implemented municipal bylaws to accelerate these timelines.

What to make of the current state of commercial real estate?

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 26 Jul, 2023
“When the tide goes out, you see who is swimming naked.” - Warren Buffett

The Rise of Rescue Capital

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 30 May, 2023
The dramatic rise in interest rates continues to reverberate through the real estate market. As a result, strategies that made sense two or three years ago may not in the current market. On the other hand, some strategies that were less appealing to us in recent years are now quite compelling. Enter preferred equity. Preferred equity sits between debt and equity on the capital stack, meaning it is paid back after debt, though prior to equity investors. As such, projected risk and returns usually fall somewhere between debt and equity. For most of the last decade, which has been characterized by strong market fundamentals and abnormally low interest rates, common equity holders have been richly rewarded for any additional risk taken. Annual returns of over 20% have been common-place. The upside was too good to pass up. The rapid rise of interest rates has since thrown cold water on the market, leading to declining prices in most asset classes. This has knocked common equity investors' return-expectations down a notch or two and losses and cash calls are becoming more common. The current economic climate also makes it much more difficult to decide what to do next. Preferred equity presents a compelling option if you believe medium-term growth for real estate assets will be more moderate and a collapse from today’s prices is unlikely. This scenario could produce equity-like returns for preferred equity investors without equity-sized risk. One place we are seeing preferred equity opportunities is in the US Multifamily market. Particularly with properties purchased within the last two years using bridge financing, which has been commonplace. For many multifamily investors, their intended strategy when they purchased the property was to increase net operating income and then refinance at lower interest rates, anticipating that they would achieve long-term financing between 70% and 80% loan to value (LTV). Due to falling values and increasing lender caution however, many borrowers have only been able to refinance between 50% and 60% LTV, leaving a gap in their capital stack. This creates an opportunity for preferred equity investors to provide an additional 10-20% of the capital stack, while still having substantial common equity behind them. There are numerous properties that will need to refinance in the coming quarters, and many see preferred equity as a natural solution to plug the gap. Current demand for preferred equity puts investors in the driver's seat to negotiate terms, and can often demand 12-14% returns, which we believe are quite attractive in the current environment. While we don’t have any current opportunities in preferred equity, we are exploring options. We look forward to discussing this strategy further should a deal present itself. As always, if you have any questions or there’s anything we can do to help, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

Bank Volatility & Real Estate

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • 28 Mar, 2023
Private real estate funds apparently are not the only thing being gated right now. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the other institutions that followed has shifted expectations and market perceptions in a dramatic fashion. And while every expert and news channel has weighed in on the event (and the subsequent reverberations in the financial markets) our team wanted to provide our insight from a real estate perspective. So, what happened, will it spread, and what does it all mean to real estate investments of the sort Hawkeye Wealth partners with?
Show More
Share by: