January 25, 2025

Why U.S. Multi-Family is Likely to Turn the Corner in 2025

Demand is high and has nearly chewed through the supply overhang in many markets, which should result in rising rents and falling vacancies over the next few years.


Introduction


The last couple of years have been painful for U.S. investors as housing prices have fallen and rent growth has stagnated or even gone negative in high supply markets. However, the pendulum is shifting and we believe that 2025 will be an excellent year to scale into multi-family housing in the U.S.

In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we walk through U.S. multi-family market data to share why we think that U.S. multi-family deals will outperform Canada in 2025.


The U.S. Bounce - Explained with 4 charts


In response to the surge in demand for housing during the pandemic, the U.S. responded with an unprecedented wave of new housing projects. The result? For 13 straight quarters, U.S. multifamily has seen more net deliveries than units absorbed, which has led vacancy rates to climb from just under 5% in 2021 to over 8% in 2025. 

Source: Co-star Data

There are two major points to glean from the chart above.


The first is that net deliveries peaked in 2024, and there is a steep decline in new units that are forecast to come online through 2028. At the end of 2024, there were only 560,000 multi-family units under construction in the U.S., the lowest number since 2018. Further, only 230,000 units broke ground in 2024, the lowest level of new construction starts since 2012. Supply is tapering, but demand remains high. (Source 
Cushman & Wakefield Q4 2024 U.S. Multifamily Report)


Second, vacancy rates for the U.S. as a whole likely peaked in late 2024. As expected from decreasing supply and vacancy rates, rents are expected to climb again in 2025 as shown in the chart below:

Source: Co-star Data

Cap rates are also at their highest levels since 2019, and are expected to remain reasonably high through 2025:

Source: Co-star Data

For investors, the set-up of high cap rates, decreasing supply and vacancy, high demand and increasing rents looks excellent, but this brings its own set of challenges, namely that many people see it coming. Transaction volumes have been low, as even those who want to sell are doing what they can to arrange financing that will allow them to hold on until they can sell in more favourable market conditions. As shown below, 2023 and 2024 saw extremely low levels of sales volume, and that likely won’t change dramatically through 2025:

Source: Co-star Data

All this is to say that while 2025 may be an interesting time to invest in U.S. real estate, there won’t necessarily be good deals everywhere you look, particularly since there is so much variance between submarkets.


For example, we closely follow the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, and we don’t expect the market there to turn until 2026. Dallas-Fort Worth led the nation both in number of units delivered in 2024 (41,018, representing 4.6% of total inventory) and units absorbed (30,718), but it still has another 35,532 units under construction. With vacancies at 11.2% and 12-month rental growth coming in at -1.2%, it will need more time than other areas of the U.S. to work through its supply overhang. The seeds of future supply crunch are being sown however, as there were only 19,930 new starts in 2024, compared to the 35,709 in 2023 and 39,213 in 2022.


That said, in some ways, the later expected turnaround makes it more likely that deals will come up in 2025, so just because a market isn’t quite ready to turn doesn’t necessarily mean that it isn’t worth looking at if the right deal comes our way.


Conclusion - It’s Time To Be Looking


In our view, it’s a great time to be looking for opportunities in the U.S.


Cap rates are comparatively high. Demand is high and has nearly chewed through the supply overhang in many markets, which should result in rising rents and falling vacancies over the next few years.


For those investors that have been carefully holding on to capital to take advantage of distress, we anticipate that 2025 will present unique opportunities with the best risk-adjusted return potential we’ve seen in years.


We have already found one U.S. deal that we are excited about this year, and suspect that with the way markets are shaping up, more are coming. 


Author

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd.

Date

January 25, 2025

Share

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. November 1, 2025
“To a landowner, there is nothing more important than security of title. Once you have fee-simple title in B.C., it has to mean that land is your land. And that is very fundamental to our province – and in fact, to the country.” - Niki Sharma, BC Attorney Genera l
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. October 4, 2025
Introduction Canadian farmland hasn’t posted a single annual decline in value since 1992 . Take a second to soak that up. More than thirty years, multiple recessions, inflation spikes, a housing crash and a tech- bubble. Through it all, farmland kept climbing. In a world where many asset classes appear vulnerable to technological disruption or shifting consumer preferences, the core value in farmland is tied to a necessity that will always remain constant. Food. In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View , we discuss the case for investing in Canadian farmland and share the most compelling points and potential risks from our due diligence on this asset class.  The Investment Case for Canadian Farmland In our view, farmland has six main features that make farmland investment attractive: 1. Consistent Performance and Low Volatility - A 30+ year track-record of positive annual returns is astounding, even more so when you consider that the average annual increase over that period has been 8.1%. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future returns, but there is merit to the fact that farmland has been remarkably consistent through periods of high market volatility. When considering that the figures above don’t account for any profit from the land, farmland has done an impressive job of delivering returns comparable to U.S. equities, but with a volatility profile that more closely resembles bonds. 2. Natural Scarcity - Most cities are established near fresh water and fertile soil. Thus as populations grow and cities expand, that development inherently reduces the base of potential farmland. While most provinces have some level of agricultural land protection program in place, the fact remains that there is a finite amount of farmable land, and each year there is less of it. 3. Diversification and Inflation Hedge - Farmland has a long track record of holding its value when inflation eats away at other assets. Rising food prices translate directly into stronger farm revenues, which in turn support rental income and land appreciation. Additionally, over the last 50 years, farms have averaged an increase in productivity of ~1.5% per year by adopting new technology and processes (machinery, irrigation, nutrient management), which serves as a natural inflation hedge. Unlike equities or bonds, farmland’s performance has shown little correlation with public markets , giving it genuine diversification benefits. 4. Investor-Tenant Alignment - For anyone feeling exhausted with the rhetoric about ‘greedy developers’, it may come as welcome news that investors and landlords aren’t automatically the bad guy in the farmland space. Research shows that farmers are able to drive higher levels of profitability per acre when renting compared to when purchasing farmland , and that trend is accelerating. While renting doesn’t necessarily outperform ownership over the long-run when accounting for land appreciation benefits, it does improve cashflow. Since farming is capital intensive, renting land allows farmers to allocate funds that would have otherwise gone to land, toward equipment and operations that improve yield and profitability. Since farmers’ profitability depends on sustaining yields, they are naturally incentivized to care for the soil and manage the land well, which not only supports their own returns but helps preserve and even enhance the underlying land value. As a result, the ‘renter’s mentality’ sometimes seen in other real estate sectors is far less common in farming. 5. Comparative Affordability - In housing, the current challenge is that people can’t afford to pay what developers can feasibly build. In comparison, while farms are comparatively less affordable than they were 5 years ago, the gap is far less dramatic than it has been in housing. Farm values and rents have rapidly increased, but the revenue generated by those farms has also substantially increased , which has slowed the loss of affordability. While current affordability levels are still a concern in the space, farmers can still operate profitably at current price levels and as shown on the chart below from Farm Credit Canada , we are nowhere near the peaks of unaffordability that farmers experienced during the 1980’s:
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. August 23, 2025
Introduction On paper, the cure for unaffordable housing is simple: build more. In practice, the very act of building undermines the incentive to keep building. The federal government has set a target of 500,000 new homes per year by 2035, but supply follows returns, not political will. As more units come online, margins shrink and investors retreat, a dynamic made worse by slowing population growth. In response, experts across Canada have signed competing open letters and budget submissions, each offering prescriptions for how to restore affordability. In this edition of The Bird’s Eye View , we explore the widening gap between Canada’s housing ambitions and the market realities on the ground. We look at why supply targets are so difficult to reach, how policy prescriptions diverge between advocates and developers, and where governments may need to adjust course to bring targets and incentives into alignment. The Scale of the Challenge By 2035, the federal government wants to see 500,000 new homes started each year ( Source ). CMHC estimates that for that same year, between 430,000 and 480,000 annual starts will be needed to restore affordability to 2019 levels ( Source ). Hitting these targets means roughly doubling today’s pace of 245,367 starts. The critical, often unstated requirement behind these supply targets is profitability. If projects don’t offer an attractive risk-adjusted return, they simply won’t get built. That challenge is already visible in Vancouver and Toronto, where housing starts are down because many projects just aren’t worth the risk of building for the returns projected. In the CMHC’s Housing Market Outlook Summer Update , CMHC cut housing start forecasts for every year from 2025–2027, with the 2027 baseline revised downward by 5.5% only five months after the previous forecast: