Blog Post

BC Multiplex Strategy - A Look Under the Hood

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • Feb 21, 2024
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we aim to improve on the traditional experience of looking under the hood by giving you a guided tour of the multiplex development strategy in BC, which has gained momentum following BCs recent housing legislation changes.

Popping the hood is a right of passage for any vehicle purchaser, though truthfully, most of us have almost no idea what we are supposed to be looking for.


If we don’t see rats nests, the belts aren’t worn and the engine looks clean, it probably passes our inspection. However, we may continue to look for a while, hoping that if something is wrong, it will jump out at us.

Unless you have some mechanical aptitude, I suspect that you’ve had this experience.


In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we aim to improve on the traditional experience of looking under the hood by giving you a guided tour of the multiplex development strategy in BC, which has gained momentum following BCs recent housing legislation changes.


We will conclude by trying to answer the only question that really matters, is this an attractive strategy for investors?


The Model


The model here is simple. Buy land. Design, get permits for, and build between 3-6 units per property. Sell the units on the open market. Do this at scale, rinse and repeat. The goal is to take advantage of the relative simplicity of these projects to keep timelines short and maximize returns.


Why now?


The strategy of building multiple units on a single family lot isn’t new, though it has previously been at least partially constrained by zoning requirements.  With the passing of Bill 44, multiplex housing is permitted on all single-family lots in municipalities with a population greater than 5,000, with the amount of units permitted varying between 3-6 depending on lot size.


Functionally, all single family lots in these municipalities got an upzone, but contrary to what usually happens with upzoning, land values didn’t immediately increase because the upzoning happened everywhere. This is one of the key reasons for why this strategy may be advantageous to investors; when you can achieve higher density without having to pay an additional premium for the land, there is an avenue for opportunity.


Compare this with the Transit Oriented Development Areas introduced by Bill 47, which allows for higher density in a bullseye around transit stations, as follows:



What we like


There’s lots to like about investing in multiplex housing, so let’s start with the strong points:


  • You can buy the land needed quickly and (relatively) inexpensively.


When compared to the land assembly process, which is usually necessary to support multi-family projects in developed areas, it is easier and less expensive to buy a handful of single family lots in good locations.

  • Shorter permitting and construction times


Comparatively, these are simpler projects, which leads to shorter development and building permit processes, as well as construction timelines.


  • Shorter project timelines provide for (slightly) more visibility into the future


We aren’t advocates of using the crystal ball around here, though when project timelines are less than 2 years, and sales begin even earlier, it makes it easier to establish reasonable assumptions for both costs and revenue based on the current environment.


  • Lower building costs


Not needing to provide underground parking and less common space reduces overall building costs.


  • Strong projected IRRs


Shorter timelines make for attractive IRRs.  The challenge is that returns are highly sensitive to any delays or slow market conditions for unit sales. 


What could go wrong


There are diverse ways that things can go wrong with any real estate project, and even though this strategy is comparatively simple, investors should be aware of potential pain points that are unique to this strategy:


  • Parking and green space


One of the pros of this strategy, effective utilization of the whole property for building space, does have obvious drawbacks with limited or no parking and minimal outdoor space. Even if the purchase prices are lower than options with these amenities, proximity to transit and parks becomes more important.


Unfortunately, we suspect that most multiplexes will be built outside of Transit Oriented Development Areas (otherwise, why wouldn’t they be developed to even higher density), so it can put these projects in a bit of an awkward spot for transportation.


  • First-mover advantage


To date, multiplexes have been hoovered up by purchasers, but it remains to be seen how deep the buyer pool is for this style of property compared to more traditional styles such as condos, townhomes, and duplexes. The level of demand is one reason we suspect this is a strategy where it will be better to be early than late. Another is that each additional multiplex on a street may exacerbate parking issues, which may make the 10th multiplex on a street a less attractive product than the 1st multiplex on a street.


  • Infrastructure Upgrades


One major challenge with this type of development is that infrastructure in single family neighbourhoods is often insufficient to support anything more than single family houses.  Sewer pipes could be undersized and electrical upgrades may be required, etc. In our experience and from conversations with developers, negotiating who pays for what upgrades and setting up latecomer agreements can present both a time and financial hurdle with this type of development.


  • Finding the Right Development Partner


Finding the right development partner is always critical, and the size and scale of these projects generally lends itself to small to mid-size developers, where the track record may not be as extensive, or there is less capacity to implement this strategy at scale.


Conclusion


At Hawkeye, we pride ourselves on being strategy agnostic. We are regularly out looking for the strategies and jurisdictions that present the most attractive real estate investment opportunities.  What this means is that we get to look under a lot of hoods.

For the most part, we like a lot of what we see with the BC multiplex strategy and there is likely opportunity here for investors.  While we haven’t found the right project to take a swing at this strategy just yet, we are keeping our eyes and ears open.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BIRD'S EYE VIEW

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 27 Apr, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide summaries and commentary on federal budget initiatives through the lens of private real estate investment. We focus on items that have seen less commentary from media, such as the potential freeze of development cost charge increases in communities over 300,000 population, and the Public Lands for Homes Plan, parts of the recently released Solving the Housing Crisis: Canada’s Housing Plan .
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 29 Mar, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we explore the stages of the real estate cycle, focusing on the multifamily asset class, and compare the very different positioning between the United States and Canada within this cycle. Let’s explore this tale of two countries!
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Jan, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we highlight 3 strategies within private real estate that we think will offer opportunities for superior risk-adjusted returns in 2024, and share our thoughts on why.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 16 Dec, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide a summary of 7 different amendments to housing law (one federal change, and six provincial changes), and share our thoughts on how we think these changes will impact investors.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 25 Nov, 2023
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we cover what cap rates are, their relationship with interest rates, then dive into why seeing negative cap rate spreads is so strange.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 20 Sep, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we take you on a deeper dive through both the art and science of one of these variables: rental rate growth.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Aug, 2023
Government plays a massive role in the supply and demand equation for housing. From the Federal down to Municipal governments, there are dozens of policies that affect housing. As an investor, you don’t need a deep understanding of the policies themselves, though you do want to understand the effects these policies have. This edition of the Bird’s Eye View will look at BC’s Energy Step Code program, outline how it is affecting development in BC, and conclude with how investors can best position themselves as governments march toward ‘net-zero’ housing. While this article focuses on BC, the trend of requiring more energy efficient housing appears to have some degree of national traction, and we anticipate that these types of policies will become more common in all Provinces, though the specifics will likely differ. BC Energy Step Code In BC, the Provincial Government’s plan to increase the energy efficiency of newly built, and renovated buildings, is called the “BC Energy Step Code”. Developers need to get into the weeds and work with “energy advisors” to review plans, model energy consumption, and ultimately, ensure that certain energy efficiency thresholds are met. As investors, what you need to know is that today, all new buildings in BC must be 20% more energy efficient than they were required to be in 2018. By 2027, that number will be 40%, and by 2032, a whopping 80%, where new buildings will be “net-zero energy ready”. However, municipalities may choose to implement these timelines even sooner. Some municipalities, such as Richmond, Surrey, North Vancouver and West Vancouver, have already implemented municipal bylaws to accelerate these timelines.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 26 Jul, 2023
“When the tide goes out, you see who is swimming naked.” - Warren Buffett
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 30 May, 2023
The dramatic rise in interest rates continues to reverberate through the real estate market. As a result, strategies that made sense two or three years ago may not in the current market. On the other hand, some strategies that were less appealing to us in recent years are now quite compelling. Enter preferred equity. Preferred equity sits between debt and equity on the capital stack, meaning it is paid back after debt, though prior to equity investors. As such, projected risk and returns usually fall somewhere between debt and equity. For most of the last decade, which has been characterized by strong market fundamentals and abnormally low interest rates, common equity holders have been richly rewarded for any additional risk taken. Annual returns of over 20% have been common-place. The upside was too good to pass up. The rapid rise of interest rates has since thrown cold water on the market, leading to declining prices in most asset classes. This has knocked common equity investors' return-expectations down a notch or two and losses and cash calls are becoming more common. The current economic climate also makes it much more difficult to decide what to do next. Preferred equity presents a compelling option if you believe medium-term growth for real estate assets will be more moderate and a collapse from today’s prices is unlikely. This scenario could produce equity-like returns for preferred equity investors without equity-sized risk. One place we are seeing preferred equity opportunities is in the US Multifamily market. Particularly with properties purchased within the last two years using bridge financing, which has been commonplace. For many multifamily investors, their intended strategy when they purchased the property was to increase net operating income and then refinance at lower interest rates, anticipating that they would achieve long-term financing between 70% and 80% loan to value (LTV). Due to falling values and increasing lender caution however, many borrowers have only been able to refinance between 50% and 60% LTV, leaving a gap in their capital stack. This creates an opportunity for preferred equity investors to provide an additional 10-20% of the capital stack, while still having substantial common equity behind them. There are numerous properties that will need to refinance in the coming quarters, and many see preferred equity as a natural solution to plug the gap. Current demand for preferred equity puts investors in the driver's seat to negotiate terms, and can often demand 12-14% returns, which we believe are quite attractive in the current environment. While we don’t have any current opportunities in preferred equity, we are exploring options. We look forward to discussing this strategy further should a deal present itself. As always, if you have any questions or there’s anything we can do to help, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 28 Mar, 2023
Private real estate funds apparently are not the only thing being gated right now. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the other institutions that followed has shifted expectations and market perceptions in a dramatic fashion. And while every expert and news channel has weighed in on the event (and the subsequent reverberations in the financial markets) our team wanted to provide our insight from a real estate perspective. So, what happened, will it spread, and what does it all mean to real estate investments of the sort Hawkeye Wealth partners with?
Show More
Share by: