Blog Post

Bank Volatility & Real Estate

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • Mar 28, 2023
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Private real estate funds apparently are not the only thing being gated right now. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the other institutions that followed has shifted expectations and market perceptions in a dramatic fashion. And while every expert and news channel has weighed in on the event (and the subsequent reverberations in the financial markets) our team wanted to provide our insight from a real estate perspective. So, what happened, will it spread, and what does it all mean to real estate investments of the sort Hawkeye Wealth partners with?

Private real estate funds apparently are not the only thing being gated right now. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the other institutions that followed has shifted expectations and market perceptions in a dramatic fashion. And while every expert and news channel has weighed in on the event (and the subsequent reverberations in the financial markets) our team wanted to provide our insight from a real estate perspective. So, what happened, will it spread, and what does it all mean to real estate investments of the sort Hawkeye Wealth partners with?

 

What Happened?

SVB suffered a classic bank run. Their clients, primarily composed of tech companies and start-ups with significant cash holdings, lost faith in their ability to withdraw their deposits when the bank failed to raise over $2 billion in capital to cover losses they suffered in the bond market.

 

The issue originated partly on the fact that SVB’s deposits tripled between 2019 and 2022. Their loan business could not keep up with that much cash so the bank decided to purchase long-dated U.S. treasury bonds, which lost significant book value due to the interest rate increases that followed. And due to an unexpected volume of deposit withdrawals, the bank had to realize those losses when they sold them for liquidity. When they announced they were raising capital to fill the gap, the alarm bells rang and the run on the bank followed. 

 

What should be a surprise to most is a bank not following one of the most important tenets of investing: diversification. They did not diversify their investments (largely government bonds that were hit hard by interest rate increases) or their deposit base (primarily a small number of tech businesses with several million dollars of deposit each). 

 

At the time of its collapse, approximately 97% of the $175B in deposits were not insured by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The idea of that capital being wiped out rattled the markets. Luckily (at least in hindsight), the government stepped in quickly enough with measures that guaranteed customers’ full access to their funds (and at the time of this writing they also secured a buyer for the embattled bank). While this helped calm the situation on the SVB front, the concern over banks’ balance sheets had already become a widespread concern.

 

How Far Will It Spread?

From Signature Bank to First Republic, to Credit Suisse and bank stocks the world over, these past two weeks have been a rollercoaster. Government intervention has been robust and swift, providing massive loans to certain banks and convincing large banks to move deposits to the embattled institutions, among other measures. 

 

The more you read about this topic, the more it starts to look like a soap opera: there was an arranged marriage (Credit Suisse’s merger with UBS orchestrated by the Swiss central bank), characters from previous seasons re-emerging (Barney Frank, from the Dodd-Frank Act, was a board member at the now-closed Signature Bank), and unexpected plot twists (central banks whipsawing their policies). 

 

The jury is not yet out on whether the actions by the private and public sector will keep these collapses from becoming a systemic issue. On the one hand, the reaction seems quicker than in previous crises, with liquidity in other forms providing a back-stop to these institutions. On the other hand, it is clear that it will still take some time for investment managers, lenders, and capital allocators to feel like they can see clearly what is around the corner. The concern over lending and a risk-mitigation-first approach can be felt across our issuer partners, industry colleagues, and others in finance.

 

What Does It All Mean for Real Estate?

While market uncertainty is never helpful for making any investment decisions, the latest developments are relatively bittersweet for real estate. 

 

Start with interest rates. There is a saying about central bank policy that states they raise interest rates until something breaks. And with the confusing macroeconomics of late (consider how good news for the labour market meant a bad day for stocks due to higher expectations of further interest rate increases), perhaps this is the type of breakage that central banks needed to see. 

 

This has already been reflected in the 25bps increase in the latest Fed announcement this past week, when markets were pricing a 50bps raise just before SVB collapsed. Minutes from the meeting signals a less aggressive rate hike regime for the rest of the year. In fact, while the Fed hasn’t announced any plans for rate cuts this year, markets disagree and are already pricing in cuts.

 

Thus, for real estate deals with floating rates and well positioned to refinance and restructure their capital stack, this could be a welcome sign that we are nearing an end of interest rate increases and potentially welcoming rate decreases some time later in the year. That should help ease the financial burden on a number of properties, allowing for much needed liquidity. 

 

This brings us to the more important question of whether you have a bad asset or a bad ownership structure. Liquidity drying up, higher market uncertainty and high asset prices in early 2022 makes for a bad cocktail. Many asset owners have had to resort to creative financing, unfavorable equity terms, and other forms of capitalizing their properties that choke out the returns of the deal. Many are turning to rescue capital in the form of preferred equity (a topic we plan to cover soon). 

 

On the one hand, that is a difficult position for the current asset holder but it presents an opportunity for groups with the right amount of patience and strong balance sheets. In fact, some industry colleagues are indeed reporting an ability to negotiate better acquisition pricing as owners are having a harder time re-structuring their assets. 

 

Conclusion

The collapse of SVB itself was in fact an example of improper patience and bad balance sheet management. The assets they held were not necessarily bad assets, but rather owned in an illiquid, improperly managed way. They had to sell at a loss at the worst possible time. And we are seeing a number of real estate operators having to do something quite similar. 

 

While we do not have a crystal ball to determine with certainty whether this current bank turmoil will reverberate across all markets, it does serve as a reminder that an investment strategy with the right fundamentals can ride out a liquidity crisis–as long as the operators themselves are managing their balance sheets well and staying prudent with debt-usage.

 

As one large Vancouver developer put it in a recent seminar: “We have put some of our properties for sale at the prices we need for the returns we want. If no one is willing to pay that now, that is fine. We’ll wait. We can afford it.”



Those are the words of someone with patience afforded by a fat wallet. Those are the words of the type of real estate partner we are looking to (and do indeed) work with. 

 

Barring a complete collapse of the economy, we believe that when acquired in good terms with a properly structured capital stack, and managed by a professional team with the right track record, real estate can weather times of market uncertainty like these. 

 

If you have any questions or would like to learn more about investing with Hawkeye Wealth, email us at info@hawkeyewealth.com or call us at (604) 368-2980.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BIRD'S EYE VIEW

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 27 Apr, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide summaries and commentary on federal budget initiatives through the lens of private real estate investment. We focus on items that have seen less commentary from media, such as the potential freeze of development cost charge increases in communities over 300,000 population, and the Public Lands for Homes Plan, parts of the recently released Solving the Housing Crisis: Canada’s Housing Plan .
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 29 Mar, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we explore the stages of the real estate cycle, focusing on the multifamily asset class, and compare the very different positioning between the United States and Canada within this cycle. Let’s explore this tale of two countries!
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 21 Feb, 2024
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we aim to improve on the traditional experience of looking under the hood by giving you a guided tour of the multiplex development strategy in BC, which has gained momentum following BCs recent housing legislation changes.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Jan, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we highlight 3 strategies within private real estate that we think will offer opportunities for superior risk-adjusted returns in 2024, and share our thoughts on why.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 16 Dec, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide a summary of 7 different amendments to housing law (one federal change, and six provincial changes), and share our thoughts on how we think these changes will impact investors.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 25 Nov, 2023
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we cover what cap rates are, their relationship with interest rates, then dive into why seeing negative cap rate spreads is so strange.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 20 Sep, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we take you on a deeper dive through both the art and science of one of these variables: rental rate growth.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Aug, 2023
Government plays a massive role in the supply and demand equation for housing. From the Federal down to Municipal governments, there are dozens of policies that affect housing. As an investor, you don’t need a deep understanding of the policies themselves, though you do want to understand the effects these policies have. This edition of the Bird’s Eye View will look at BC’s Energy Step Code program, outline how it is affecting development in BC, and conclude with how investors can best position themselves as governments march toward ‘net-zero’ housing. While this article focuses on BC, the trend of requiring more energy efficient housing appears to have some degree of national traction, and we anticipate that these types of policies will become more common in all Provinces, though the specifics will likely differ. BC Energy Step Code In BC, the Provincial Government’s plan to increase the energy efficiency of newly built, and renovated buildings, is called the “BC Energy Step Code”. Developers need to get into the weeds and work with “energy advisors” to review plans, model energy consumption, and ultimately, ensure that certain energy efficiency thresholds are met. As investors, what you need to know is that today, all new buildings in BC must be 20% more energy efficient than they were required to be in 2018. By 2027, that number will be 40%, and by 2032, a whopping 80%, where new buildings will be “net-zero energy ready”. However, municipalities may choose to implement these timelines even sooner. Some municipalities, such as Richmond, Surrey, North Vancouver and West Vancouver, have already implemented municipal bylaws to accelerate these timelines.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 26 Jul, 2023
“When the tide goes out, you see who is swimming naked.” - Warren Buffett
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 30 May, 2023
The dramatic rise in interest rates continues to reverberate through the real estate market. As a result, strategies that made sense two or three years ago may not in the current market. On the other hand, some strategies that were less appealing to us in recent years are now quite compelling. Enter preferred equity. Preferred equity sits between debt and equity on the capital stack, meaning it is paid back after debt, though prior to equity investors. As such, projected risk and returns usually fall somewhere between debt and equity. For most of the last decade, which has been characterized by strong market fundamentals and abnormally low interest rates, common equity holders have been richly rewarded for any additional risk taken. Annual returns of over 20% have been common-place. The upside was too good to pass up. The rapid rise of interest rates has since thrown cold water on the market, leading to declining prices in most asset classes. This has knocked common equity investors' return-expectations down a notch or two and losses and cash calls are becoming more common. The current economic climate also makes it much more difficult to decide what to do next. Preferred equity presents a compelling option if you believe medium-term growth for real estate assets will be more moderate and a collapse from today’s prices is unlikely. This scenario could produce equity-like returns for preferred equity investors without equity-sized risk. One place we are seeing preferred equity opportunities is in the US Multifamily market. Particularly with properties purchased within the last two years using bridge financing, which has been commonplace. For many multifamily investors, their intended strategy when they purchased the property was to increase net operating income and then refinance at lower interest rates, anticipating that they would achieve long-term financing between 70% and 80% loan to value (LTV). Due to falling values and increasing lender caution however, many borrowers have only been able to refinance between 50% and 60% LTV, leaving a gap in their capital stack. This creates an opportunity for preferred equity investors to provide an additional 10-20% of the capital stack, while still having substantial common equity behind them. There are numerous properties that will need to refinance in the coming quarters, and many see preferred equity as a natural solution to plug the gap. Current demand for preferred equity puts investors in the driver's seat to negotiate terms, and can often demand 12-14% returns, which we believe are quite attractive in the current environment. While we don’t have any current opportunities in preferred equity, we are exploring options. We look forward to discussing this strategy further should a deal present itself. As always, if you have any questions or there’s anything we can do to help, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
Show More
Share by: