Blog Post

Deal Structure Matters

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. • Feb 25, 2023
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Many factors influence the probability of success for any private real estate investment, including the strength of the market, the quality of the deal operator, and the quality of the asset. However, deal structure is an oft neglected element of risk and return that can lead investors to make poorer decisions and leave money on the table. 

 

We will discuss two common investment structures, individual deals and funds, to help you understand the pros and cons of each and determine which is a better fit for your portfolio.

 

For clarity, we define individual private deals as investments where a specific asset has been identified and put under contract by the operator, with an entity formed for the sole purpose of acquiring that asset. Private funds on the other hand are usually set up with a defined strategy of acquiring multiple assets within the same entity, though those assets haven’t been identified or put under contract yet. 

 

There are multiple reasons one may choose to invest in a private real estate fund, including:

  • Potential redemption options rather than having to wait until an individual asset is sold
  • Built-in diversification due to the fund holding multiple assets
  • Higher degree of passivity for investors as they delegate the responsibility to select which assets they’ll invest in entirely to the fund manager

The pros of investing in a fund are essentially the cons of investing in an individual deal, where redemption options are limited and there is little to no built-in diversification. While individual deals are usually quite passive once you decide to invest, some due diligence to understand the deal before going ahead is highly recommended, whether you do it yourself or rely on companies such as ours. So why might you decide to invest in individual deals and why is this our preferred structure for equity deals with our clients? It mainly comes down to three main benefits:


  • Capital is used more efficiently, often generating higher risk-adjusted returns


Funds rarely have their cash fully invested, which drags down returns. This is for a few reasons. One is that since funds raise money prior to finding properties to invest in, that cash may be sitting for months or even years before being put to work. Another is that some funds offer redemption options, requiring sufficient cash to fund potential redemptions whether they materialize or not. For individual deals, cash is usually put to work quickly and no cash has to be set aside for potential redemptions. This more efficient use of capital results in higher returns, all else being equal. 

 

It is also common for closed-ended funds to get commitments on investment amounts from investors and then only ask for the money as it is needed for deals. These funds often calculate annualized returns only from the time the cash call is made, not from the time of the commitment. This makes returns appear higher because of the shorter amount of time that the cash was with the manager. In practice though, most investors will keep any committed capital in highly liquid and lower risk investments to be ready for any cash calls, likely generating only a nominal return in the interim. As such, many closed-ended funds generate a lower annualized return in practice than in theory.

 

  • No commingling of funds


Another benefit of investing in a variety of individual deals is that there is no commingling of funds. This means that if a particular deal you have invested in performs poorly, there is no impact on your other deals since each deal is in a separate entity. As such, our goal becomes to pick and choose which individual deals have the best potential risk-adjusted returns. 

 

  • Greater control over the assets invested in


Perhaps the biggest benefit of investing in individual deals is we know exactly what we are investing in before doing so, allowing us and our investor group to do due diligence on a deal by deal basis before making the decision to invest. Investing on a deal by deal basis also allows our investors to create a bespoke portfolio of assets according to their individual strategies. 

 

Furthermore, since each new individual deal requires a new investment decision, this strategy forces us and our investors to keep our fingers on the pulse of the market. Not only must we decide if a particular deal is worthwhile, we must also determine regularly whether the broader investment strategy continues to make sense in the current environment or whether we need to pivot. This constant review is something investors are less likely to do when investing in a fund since no new decisions need to be made other than whether to stay in the fund or not. 

 

Something to keep in mind is that pivoting strategies is easy for you, the investor, who just has to change the operator or fund you send the cheque to. Pivoting strategies for operators and funds is much tougher though, as they have often built entire systems and teams around specific investment strategies. As a result, they may be more hesitant to change the strategies they employ, even when the evidence suggests they should. 

 

The ability to pivot with ease can lead to better deal selection and higher risk-adjusted returns over the long run, which is our goal at Hawkeye Wealth. 
 

Which strategy is better for you? 

 

When deciding which structure is right for you, it usually comes down to two main questions. How badly do you need liquidity for your investment and is your portfolio large enough that you can achieve proper diversification across a number of individual deals?

 

Most individual deals are illiquid. As such, you must determine how much of your portfolio you would be comfortable not having access to for longer periods of time, usually at least three years, though often longer. 

 

After determining an amount of capital that you would be comfortable having illiquid, the question is whether that illiquid portion is substantial enough to be able to diversify across a number of individual deals, each with varying minimum cheque sizes. For reference, most of our deals have minimum cheque sizes of $50,000 and $100,000. 

 

If your portfolio is smaller, making you hesitant to take on concentration risk and liquidity risk, investing in public and private funds could be a great option for you. If your portfolio is large enough to achieve some diversification across individual private deals and you don’t require liquidity for this portion of your portfolio, you should consider looking more seriously at investing on a deal by deal basis to potentially earn a higher risk-adjusted return. 

 

We hope you are enjoying the Bird’s Eye View. As always, please feel free to reply to this email or call us if there’s anything we can do to help or you would be interested in working with us on future deals. 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BIRD'S EYE VIEW

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 27 Apr, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide summaries and commentary on federal budget initiatives through the lens of private real estate investment. We focus on items that have seen less commentary from media, such as the potential freeze of development cost charge increases in communities over 300,000 population, and the Public Lands for Homes Plan, parts of the recently released Solving the Housing Crisis: Canada’s Housing Plan .
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 29 Mar, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we explore the stages of the real estate cycle, focusing on the multifamily asset class, and compare the very different positioning between the United States and Canada within this cycle. Let’s explore this tale of two countries!
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 21 Feb, 2024
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we aim to improve on the traditional experience of looking under the hood by giving you a guided tour of the multiplex development strategy in BC, which has gained momentum following BCs recent housing legislation changes.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Jan, 2024
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we highlight 3 strategies within private real estate that we think will offer opportunities for superior risk-adjusted returns in 2024, and share our thoughts on why.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 16 Dec, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we provide a summary of 7 different amendments to housing law (one federal change, and six provincial changes), and share our thoughts on how we think these changes will impact investors.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 25 Nov, 2023
In this edition of the Birds Eye View, we cover what cap rates are, their relationship with interest rates, then dive into why seeing negative cap rate spreads is so strange.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 20 Sep, 2023
In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we take you on a deeper dive through both the art and science of one of these variables: rental rate growth.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 19 Aug, 2023
Government plays a massive role in the supply and demand equation for housing. From the Federal down to Municipal governments, there are dozens of policies that affect housing. As an investor, you don’t need a deep understanding of the policies themselves, though you do want to understand the effects these policies have. This edition of the Bird’s Eye View will look at BC’s Energy Step Code program, outline how it is affecting development in BC, and conclude with how investors can best position themselves as governments march toward ‘net-zero’ housing. While this article focuses on BC, the trend of requiring more energy efficient housing appears to have some degree of national traction, and we anticipate that these types of policies will become more common in all Provinces, though the specifics will likely differ. BC Energy Step Code In BC, the Provincial Government’s plan to increase the energy efficiency of newly built, and renovated buildings, is called the “BC Energy Step Code”. Developers need to get into the weeds and work with “energy advisors” to review plans, model energy consumption, and ultimately, ensure that certain energy efficiency thresholds are met. As investors, what you need to know is that today, all new buildings in BC must be 20% more energy efficient than they were required to be in 2018. By 2027, that number will be 40%, and by 2032, a whopping 80%, where new buildings will be “net-zero energy ready”. However, municipalities may choose to implement these timelines even sooner. Some municipalities, such as Richmond, Surrey, North Vancouver and West Vancouver, have already implemented municipal bylaws to accelerate these timelines.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 26 Jul, 2023
“When the tide goes out, you see who is swimming naked.” - Warren Buffett
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. 30 May, 2023
The dramatic rise in interest rates continues to reverberate through the real estate market. As a result, strategies that made sense two or three years ago may not in the current market. On the other hand, some strategies that were less appealing to us in recent years are now quite compelling. Enter preferred equity. Preferred equity sits between debt and equity on the capital stack, meaning it is paid back after debt, though prior to equity investors. As such, projected risk and returns usually fall somewhere between debt and equity. For most of the last decade, which has been characterized by strong market fundamentals and abnormally low interest rates, common equity holders have been richly rewarded for any additional risk taken. Annual returns of over 20% have been common-place. The upside was too good to pass up. The rapid rise of interest rates has since thrown cold water on the market, leading to declining prices in most asset classes. This has knocked common equity investors' return-expectations down a notch or two and losses and cash calls are becoming more common. The current economic climate also makes it much more difficult to decide what to do next. Preferred equity presents a compelling option if you believe medium-term growth for real estate assets will be more moderate and a collapse from today’s prices is unlikely. This scenario could produce equity-like returns for preferred equity investors without equity-sized risk. One place we are seeing preferred equity opportunities is in the US Multifamily market. Particularly with properties purchased within the last two years using bridge financing, which has been commonplace. For many multifamily investors, their intended strategy when they purchased the property was to increase net operating income and then refinance at lower interest rates, anticipating that they would achieve long-term financing between 70% and 80% loan to value (LTV). Due to falling values and increasing lender caution however, many borrowers have only been able to refinance between 50% and 60% LTV, leaving a gap in their capital stack. This creates an opportunity for preferred equity investors to provide an additional 10-20% of the capital stack, while still having substantial common equity behind them. There are numerous properties that will need to refinance in the coming quarters, and many see preferred equity as a natural solution to plug the gap. Current demand for preferred equity puts investors in the driver's seat to negotiate terms, and can often demand 12-14% returns, which we believe are quite attractive in the current environment. While we don’t have any current opportunities in preferred equity, we are exploring options. We look forward to discussing this strategy further should a deal present itself. As always, if you have any questions or there’s anything we can do to help, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
Show More
Share by: