May 25, 2024

Breaking Down the CMHCs 2024 Housing Market Outlook

In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we review and analyze the 2024 Housing Market Outlook report, prepared by CMHC, where they forecast major price and rent increases in Canada over the next three years.


The year is 2026, and when compared to 2023:


  • Home prices across Canada are 20.1% higher
  • New housing starts in Canada are 11% lower than they were between 2021-2023.
  • Rents in Vancouver are up by 28.6%.


That’s the future portrayed by the CMHC in their 2024 Housing Market Outlook, which was released on May 1, 2024. Their forecast paints a bullish picture for real estate investment in Canada, though sadly, it also implies that unless we see major changes in policy and economics, Canada will fail spectacularly at addressing the housing crisis.

While we think there is reason to believe that the CMHC may be overestimating price and rent growth, this report serves as an interesting data point for what could happen if Canada continues on its current trajectory of low supply and high population growth.

In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we examine some of the key findings of this report, and opine on how likely it is that their forecast is accurate based on what we know today.


Lower Housing Starts


"Expecting lower housing starts in 2024. There is a slight improvement forecasted over the next 2 years. Supply challenges, notably the lagged effects of higher interest rates, mean that new construction in 2025–2026 won’t reach 2021–2023 levels."


It's almost comical that just a few weeks after the Federal government formally set a target of 3.87M new homes by 2031 (a pace of 483,750 new homes per year), CMHC, the Federal Crown corporation responsible for housing, says that for at least the next 3 years, they expect housing starts to come in lower than the 240,000 starts recorded in 2023. Even CMHC doesn't expect the Federal Government's housing plans to work.

If CMHCs supply forecast through 2026 is correct (an average of 229,615 new starts per year), Canada would need to build 636,231 homes per year from 2027-2031 to hit the 3.87M new home target. In other words, we would need to hold a 5-year average of 2.35x more starts than the highest year ever recorded (271,198 in 2021), That’s possible right?

Genuinely, we love big goals, but even if we saw a massive wave of policy change to incentivize the level of private investment and building that’s needed to nearly double housing starts, we simply don’t have the labour to develop at that pace in the short term.

Our take: We wholeheartedly agree with CMHC’s forecast on supply. Lower interest rates will help, but we’ve got a pretty good pulse on the economics of the average development deal, and from what we are seeing, we don’t think it’s likely we will see an uptick in supply over the next few years.


Home Prices Up


“Demand for homes will push prices up throughout the projection horizon. By 2025, prices could reach the peak level recorded in early 2022 and surpass it in the following year… We anticipate a rebound in MLS® sales and prices from 2024 to 2026, fueled by declining mortgage rates alongside stronger growth in population and real disposable income.


[The] strong population growth recorded in 2023, the highest since the 1950s, will continue into 2024."

CMHC's underlying thesis for higher housing prices is strong population growth and falling interest rates amidst insufficient supply. However, we think there’s reason to believe that CMHC may be overestimating population growth.


The Federal government has already signaled its target of reducing the non-permanent resident count to 5% of the population by 2027 (Minister Miller’s Speaking Notes, March 21, 2024), which implies a 0.74% population growth rate between 2024-2027, down from 3.2% in 2023.


It’s true that 2024 population growth will likely be higher than 2025-2027, as it takes time to slow down non-permanent resident intake programs. In spite of this, we think that the 2024 population growth rate will likely be much lower than it was in 2023 and that growth rates will continue declining through 2027 (subject to further policy change).


Our take: We do think that prices will increase, though because we believe population growth will be much lower than what CMHC is forecasting, we anticipate that price increases will be more modest than the 6.7% rate average forecasted by CMHC for the next 3 years.

Rents Up 


“Rental demand will remain high in 2024, contributing to continued rent growth across all bedroom types. We expect that turnovers will continue to be low, as existing renters have limited alternatives in the rental market.


As mortgage rates decline, some households that transition from renting to homeownership may alleviate some rental demand. However, if immigration to British Columbia (which is absorbed by Vancouver) remains at levels seen in recent quarters, it will continue to put pressure on the rental market, as immigrants are more likely to be renters.”


In the report, rent increases are broken down by market and not aggregated at the national level, but in the Vancouver region, CMHC is forecasting that average 2-bedroom rents in the Greater Vancouver area will rise from $2,181 in 2023 to $2,800 by 2026, a 28.4% increase over 3 years.


Our take: We agree with much of CMHC’s logic. It is true that Vancouver sees disproportionate levels of immigration inflow and that demand will remain strong, but we don’t see population growth continuing at the levels seen in 2023, and as such, we are using lower rental growth numbers in our underwriting.


Conclusion


Though not expressly stated, this report implies that without policy and economic changes, CMHC believes our country will catastrophically fail at addressing the housing crisis over the next 3 years. Housing will become much more unaffordable for both owners and renters. 


In our opinion, population growth rates will be lower than CMHC’s forecast, but in combination with low levels of new supply and interest rate reductions, we still expect to see increases in prices and rents, just at a slower pace than the report suggests.

If CMHC's forecast comes even close to being accurate though, there is a lot of potential upside on today’s projects.

Author

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd.

Date

May 25, 2024

Share

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. November 1, 2025
“To a landowner, there is nothing more important than security of title. Once you have fee-simple title in B.C., it has to mean that land is your land. And that is very fundamental to our province – and in fact, to the country.” - Niki Sharma, BC Attorney Genera l
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. October 4, 2025
Introduction Canadian farmland hasn’t posted a single annual decline in value since 1992 . Take a second to soak that up. More than thirty years, multiple recessions, inflation spikes, a housing crash and a tech- bubble. Through it all, farmland kept climbing. In a world where many asset classes appear vulnerable to technological disruption or shifting consumer preferences, the core value in farmland is tied to a necessity that will always remain constant. Food. In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View , we discuss the case for investing in Canadian farmland and share the most compelling points and potential risks from our due diligence on this asset class.  The Investment Case for Canadian Farmland In our view, farmland has six main features that make farmland investment attractive: 1. Consistent Performance and Low Volatility - A 30+ year track-record of positive annual returns is astounding, even more so when you consider that the average annual increase over that period has been 8.1%. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future returns, but there is merit to the fact that farmland has been remarkably consistent through periods of high market volatility. When considering that the figures above don’t account for any profit from the land, farmland has done an impressive job of delivering returns comparable to U.S. equities, but with a volatility profile that more closely resembles bonds. 2. Natural Scarcity - Most cities are established near fresh water and fertile soil. Thus as populations grow and cities expand, that development inherently reduces the base of potential farmland. While most provinces have some level of agricultural land protection program in place, the fact remains that there is a finite amount of farmable land, and each year there is less of it. 3. Diversification and Inflation Hedge - Farmland has a long track record of holding its value when inflation eats away at other assets. Rising food prices translate directly into stronger farm revenues, which in turn support rental income and land appreciation. Additionally, over the last 50 years, farms have averaged an increase in productivity of ~1.5% per year by adopting new technology and processes (machinery, irrigation, nutrient management), which serves as a natural inflation hedge. Unlike equities or bonds, farmland’s performance has shown little correlation with public markets , giving it genuine diversification benefits. 4. Investor-Tenant Alignment - For anyone feeling exhausted with the rhetoric about ‘greedy developers’, it may come as welcome news that investors and landlords aren’t automatically the bad guy in the farmland space. Research shows that farmers are able to drive higher levels of profitability per acre when renting compared to when purchasing farmland , and that trend is accelerating. While renting doesn’t necessarily outperform ownership over the long-run when accounting for land appreciation benefits, it does improve cashflow. Since farming is capital intensive, renting land allows farmers to allocate funds that would have otherwise gone to land, toward equipment and operations that improve yield and profitability. Since farmers’ profitability depends on sustaining yields, they are naturally incentivized to care for the soil and manage the land well, which not only supports their own returns but helps preserve and even enhance the underlying land value. As a result, the ‘renter’s mentality’ sometimes seen in other real estate sectors is far less common in farming. 5. Comparative Affordability - In housing, the current challenge is that people can’t afford to pay what developers can feasibly build. In comparison, while farms are comparatively less affordable than they were 5 years ago, the gap is far less dramatic than it has been in housing. Farm values and rents have rapidly increased, but the revenue generated by those farms has also substantially increased , which has slowed the loss of affordability. While current affordability levels are still a concern in the space, farmers can still operate profitably at current price levels and as shown on the chart below from Farm Credit Canada , we are nowhere near the peaks of unaffordability that farmers experienced during the 1980’s:
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. August 23, 2025
Introduction On paper, the cure for unaffordable housing is simple: build more. In practice, the very act of building undermines the incentive to keep building. The federal government has set a target of 500,000 new homes per year by 2035, but supply follows returns, not political will. As more units come online, margins shrink and investors retreat, a dynamic made worse by slowing population growth. In response, experts across Canada have signed competing open letters and budget submissions, each offering prescriptions for how to restore affordability. In this edition of The Bird’s Eye View , we explore the widening gap between Canada’s housing ambitions and the market realities on the ground. We look at why supply targets are so difficult to reach, how policy prescriptions diverge between advocates and developers, and where governments may need to adjust course to bring targets and incentives into alignment. The Scale of the Challenge By 2035, the federal government wants to see 500,000 new homes started each year ( Source ). CMHC estimates that for that same year, between 430,000 and 480,000 annual starts will be needed to restore affordability to 2019 levels ( Source ). Hitting these targets means roughly doubling today’s pace of 245,367 starts. The critical, often unstated requirement behind these supply targets is profitability. If projects don’t offer an attractive risk-adjusted return, they simply won’t get built. That challenge is already visible in Vancouver and Toronto, where housing starts are down because many projects just aren’t worth the risk of building for the returns projected. In the CMHC’s Housing Market Outlook Summer Update , CMHC cut housing start forecasts for every year from 2025–2027, with the 2027 baseline revised downward by 5.5% only five months after the previous forecast: