September 21, 2024

A Poor Man's Guide to Market Assessment

"We may never know where we’re going, but we’d better have a good idea where we are."

- Howard Marks


“It’s a great time to be investing capital. We’ve been doing it for the last 6 months in real estate. I expect you’ll see a lot of it in the back half of the year as well”.


- Jon Gray, Blackstone President, July 25, 2024

 

“It’s too early to buy distressed CRE…If the economy starts to slow down more meaningfully, as the consensus expects, the problems for rental housing, multifamily, and warehouses will get a lot worse.”


- Torsten Sløk, Apollo Chief Economist, August 16, 2024

 

Jon Gray and Torsten Sløk, leaders in their respective multi-billion dollar funds have drawn their lines in the sand on real estate. While we don’t know which of these predictions will prove more correct, the fact that they are so opposed is a stark reminder that even the most skilled investors struggle to precisely predict the peaks and troughs of market cycles, both in terms of extent and timing.

 

Howard Marks, another distinguished investor, makes the case that investors shouldn’t overly concern themselves with guessing the future, and should keep their primary focus on current conditions:

 

Most people strive to adjust their portfolios based on what they think lies ahead. At the same time, however, most people would admit forward visibility just isn’t that great.

 

That’s why I make the case for responding to the current realities and their implications, as opposed to expecting the future to be made clear. (The Most Important Thing, Chapter 15)

 

In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we discuss the importance of focusing on the current state of the market, and share a practical exercise from Howard Marks called “The Poor Man’s Guide to Market Assessment”, that can help you with that. We will also share how we’ve adapted that assessment to allow us to better gauge and compare markets over time.



The Poor Man’s Guide to Market Assessment


In Chapter 15 of 
The Most Important Thing, Howard Marks introduces “The Poor Man’s Guide to Market Assessment” by saying:


I have listed a number of market characteristics. For each pair, check off the one you think is most descriptive of today. If you find that most of your check marks are in the left-hand column, as I do, hold on to your wallet.


Try it yourself: As you read through the assessment, consider how each characteristic applies to a market that you follow closely. What trends do you notice?

I suspect that for the most part, your answers landed primarily in the right column.

The Poor Man’s Guide to Market Assessment is much as the title implies, a quick and dirty exercise to gauge the position of a market. In the simplest terms, it aims to determine what the herd is currently doing.


We want to know what the herd is doing so we can do the opposite. Warren Buffet offers the famed advice that investors should, “be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful”.


When you hear things like “which options should I buy with my Covid relief (CERB) money”? or when banks begin offering NINJA mortgages (No Income, No Job or Assets), it’s time to be fearful. It’s easy to spot market froth with hindsight, but it’s considerably harder to avoid poor decisions when you find out that your 15 year-old neighbour became an overnight millionaire with some obscure cryptocurrency.


On the other hand, it is equally difficult to muster the confidence to purchase assets when it seems like all you read is bad news about the current economy and future prospects.



The Modified Poor Man’s Guide


Since October 2022, our team has completed a modified version of the Poor Man’s Guide to Market Assessment each month.


We’ve adapted the assessment by adding a scoring system, with the characteristics on the left earning a positive value and those on the right, a negative one. The results allow us to quickly evaluate market trends and better quantify how strongly market sentiment is leaning.


Each month this assessment helps us break out of the herd mentality, and gives us directionality on which real estate markets we should focus on, based on where fear is the highest.


For example, in Vancouver, many of the market characteristics are in the right-hand column, but there are other characteristics, such as stubbornly high asset prices that balance out the overall score. Unless there is an exceptional deal on the table, this exercise points to markets where scores are more deeply negative.




Limitations of the Assessment


There are some inherent limitations to this assessment worth noting:


1. This exercise is much more precise, and therefore more valuable for decision making, when applied to narrow markets.


Example:

2. This exercise was never meant to have scores attached to it. That said, if you do decide to take a similar approach, we recommend giving consideration to assigning higher weights to the most important characteristics. For example, the Asset Prices characteristic might have a higher weighting than other characteristics. For us, the aim was to get this to a spot where the scores accurately reflect the conditions and sentiment we see, which required some manipulation.


3. If being used for comparison purposes, such as comparing sentiment scores between Nashville and Calgary multi-family markets, a fair amount of market specific knowledge is required to accurately answer the questions.


4. It’s a starting point for further analysis and research, not an ending point.



Conclusion


In the words of Howard Marks, “We may never know where we’re going, but we’d better have a good idea where we are.”


We aren’t Jon Gray or Torsten Sløk, and we don’t know whose prediction will be more correct in the future.


What we can comfortably say is that while Apollo may be right that there is more pain ahead, from our perspective, it’s also the case that most real estate markets in North America are experiencing at least some degree of pain in the present.


Investors that stay sensitive to those markets that are experiencing the most bearish market characteristics will be well positioned to take advantage of deals as they arise.

Author

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd.

Date

September 21, 2024

Share

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. November 1, 2025
“To a landowner, there is nothing more important than security of title. Once you have fee-simple title in B.C., it has to mean that land is your land. And that is very fundamental to our province – and in fact, to the country.” - Niki Sharma, BC Attorney Genera l
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. October 4, 2025
Introduction Canadian farmland hasn’t posted a single annual decline in value since 1992 . Take a second to soak that up. More than thirty years, multiple recessions, inflation spikes, a housing crash and a tech- bubble. Through it all, farmland kept climbing. In a world where many asset classes appear vulnerable to technological disruption or shifting consumer preferences, the core value in farmland is tied to a necessity that will always remain constant. Food. In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View , we discuss the case for investing in Canadian farmland and share the most compelling points and potential risks from our due diligence on this asset class.  The Investment Case for Canadian Farmland In our view, farmland has six main features that make farmland investment attractive: 1. Consistent Performance and Low Volatility - A 30+ year track-record of positive annual returns is astounding, even more so when you consider that the average annual increase over that period has been 8.1%. Past performance doesn’t guarantee future returns, but there is merit to the fact that farmland has been remarkably consistent through periods of high market volatility. When considering that the figures above don’t account for any profit from the land, farmland has done an impressive job of delivering returns comparable to U.S. equities, but with a volatility profile that more closely resembles bonds. 2. Natural Scarcity - Most cities are established near fresh water and fertile soil. Thus as populations grow and cities expand, that development inherently reduces the base of potential farmland. While most provinces have some level of agricultural land protection program in place, the fact remains that there is a finite amount of farmable land, and each year there is less of it. 3. Diversification and Inflation Hedge - Farmland has a long track record of holding its value when inflation eats away at other assets. Rising food prices translate directly into stronger farm revenues, which in turn support rental income and land appreciation. Additionally, over the last 50 years, farms have averaged an increase in productivity of ~1.5% per year by adopting new technology and processes (machinery, irrigation, nutrient management), which serves as a natural inflation hedge. Unlike equities or bonds, farmland’s performance has shown little correlation with public markets , giving it genuine diversification benefits. 4. Investor-Tenant Alignment - For anyone feeling exhausted with the rhetoric about ‘greedy developers’, it may come as welcome news that investors and landlords aren’t automatically the bad guy in the farmland space. Research shows that farmers are able to drive higher levels of profitability per acre when renting compared to when purchasing farmland , and that trend is accelerating. While renting doesn’t necessarily outperform ownership over the long-run when accounting for land appreciation benefits, it does improve cashflow. Since farming is capital intensive, renting land allows farmers to allocate funds that would have otherwise gone to land, toward equipment and operations that improve yield and profitability. Since farmers’ profitability depends on sustaining yields, they are naturally incentivized to care for the soil and manage the land well, which not only supports their own returns but helps preserve and even enhance the underlying land value. As a result, the ‘renter’s mentality’ sometimes seen in other real estate sectors is far less common in farming. 5. Comparative Affordability - In housing, the current challenge is that people can’t afford to pay what developers can feasibly build. In comparison, while farms are comparatively less affordable than they were 5 years ago, the gap is far less dramatic than it has been in housing. Farm values and rents have rapidly increased, but the revenue generated by those farms has also substantially increased , which has slowed the loss of affordability. While current affordability levels are still a concern in the space, farmers can still operate profitably at current price levels and as shown on the chart below from Farm Credit Canada , we are nowhere near the peaks of unaffordability that farmers experienced during the 1980’s:
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. August 23, 2025
Introduction On paper, the cure for unaffordable housing is simple: build more. In practice, the very act of building undermines the incentive to keep building. The federal government has set a target of 500,000 new homes per year by 2035, but supply follows returns, not political will. As more units come online, margins shrink and investors retreat, a dynamic made worse by slowing population growth. In response, experts across Canada have signed competing open letters and budget submissions, each offering prescriptions for how to restore affordability. In this edition of The Bird’s Eye View , we explore the widening gap between Canada’s housing ambitions and the market realities on the ground. We look at why supply targets are so difficult to reach, how policy prescriptions diverge between advocates and developers, and where governments may need to adjust course to bring targets and incentives into alignment. The Scale of the Challenge By 2035, the federal government wants to see 500,000 new homes started each year ( Source ). CMHC estimates that for that same year, between 430,000 and 480,000 annual starts will be needed to restore affordability to 2019 levels ( Source ). Hitting these targets means roughly doubling today’s pace of 245,367 starts. The critical, often unstated requirement behind these supply targets is profitability. If projects don’t offer an attractive risk-adjusted return, they simply won’t get built. That challenge is already visible in Vancouver and Toronto, where housing starts are down because many projects just aren’t worth the risk of building for the returns projected. In the CMHC’s Housing Market Outlook Summer Update , CMHC cut housing start forecasts for every year from 2025–2027, with the 2027 baseline revised downward by 5.5% only five months after the previous forecast: