April 9, 2026

Signals of a Market Bottom - A Deep Dive

“Rule No. 1: Most things will prove to be cyclical. Rule No. 2: Some of the greatest opportunities for gain and loss come when people forget Rule No. 1.”

— Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital


Introduction


In the past, we’ve written about the market cycle generally, but today we will take a more focused approach as we walk through 40 years of data to better understand the typical conditions and signals associated with market bottoms.


There are 4 different statistics that when combined, provide exceptional insight into market health and likely price trajectory for any given housing type: unabsorbed inventory, completions, inventory under construction and average construction times.

In this edition of the bird’s eye view, we take a rigorous approach to walking you through the CMHCs data on each of these statistics, discuss how they are used to understand and forecast market bottoms, and share rough estimates for how far off a market bottom each housing type is.


Unabsorbed inventory


Unabsorbed inventory refers to residential units that have reached physical completion but that have yet to be purchased or rented. It’s a critical variable for assessing market health and for determining position within the market cycle because it has very little lag effect.  If unabsorbed inventory is on the rise, it’s because people can’t or aren’t willing to pay at current price levels.  Similarly, if it’s falling, it’s because demand is outpacing supply in real time.


While there are lots of variables in real estate that have connection to prices, there are very few where that relationship is so immediately obvious.  Market bottoms tend to coincide with periods of high unabsorbed inventory, and market tops are associated with low unabsorbed inventory.

On the charts below, note the periods of high and low unabsorbed inventory represented by the black line, and compare it to the annual percentage change in the New Housing Price Index represented by the red line.  The top chart is BC and Ontario is on the bottom:

Graph comparing Canadian population growth and new home prices from 1982-2007. Includes projected growth rate.

*Cautionary Note: As always, data is only a useful predictor when it is reliable, and while we believe the CMHC data generally corresponds with conditions on the ground in terms of direction, we suspect there is something inconsistent happening with the absolute numbers. It genuinely surprises us that BC is reported to have almost half of all unabsorbed units in Canada and nearly twice as many unabsorbed units as Ontario. The CMHC has formally acknowledged it “is conducting a methodology review of the unabsorbed inventory data series in the Ontario context, and advises that this data be used with caution.”

There may be issues with this data and we don’t know which way the data might be skewed, but we do believe that unabsorbed inventory in both markets is at or near its all time highs. As is typical of this inverse relationship, prices have been falling to match.

But there is a wrinkle to this logic. Not all asset classes are going through the same level of absorption crisis.  Consider the data below across Canada as a whole:

Table comparing provincial NPR figures in July 2021 and July 2004, including increase percentage and population share.

Since 2022, the delivery of new completions across all housing types has consistently outpaced market absorption, signaling a growing disconnect between pricing and current buyer demand.  Even as prices have fallen, unabsorbed inventories have continued to climb, which puts further downward pressure on prices.

Knowing what is happening has some use, but the real value comes from using this data to get a sense for what may happen over the next 1-2 years.  To do that, we need to understand how many completions there have been and how many there are likely to be based on average construction times as inventory under construction is completed.


Completions


When unabsorbed inventory is considered alongside completions, you get a sense for the number of new units that the market can absorb:

Looking at each asset class, the absorption picture becomes more clear.

Apartments
- Historically high levels of apartment completions in 2023-2025 pushed the unabsorbed inventory higher, but the class has actually performed comparatively well.  Apartments represent 63.2% of all completions in 2025, but only 41% of the unabsorbed units.

Row housing
- Completions were well above historical averages, but the market has hit a saturation point. Row housing represents 10.3% of all completions, but 20.4% of the total unabsorbed inventory.  These units are having a hard time finding buyers at current price levels.

Single detached - Completions have been slightly below historical averages over the last 5 years, unabsorbed inventory has climbed, meaning demand for single detached has been tepid.  Single-detached homes account for 21.8% of total completions, but 29% of unabsorbed inventory.

Semi-detached
- This type only represents 4.8% of total completions, but makes up 9.6% of unabsorbed inventory.


Combining unabsorbed inventory with completions by type, we can derive the unabsorbed inventory to completion ratio (UCR), which shows the percentage of homes in that housing type that are unsold relative to the amount constructed each year.  This is one of the most critical statistics for understanding the current market demand for any given asset type:

Source: Derived from CMHC Housing Market Information Portal, Calculated by Hawkeye Wealth

Asset types with a lower UCR mean there is higher demand for that asset, so it is easier to see that for everything other than apartments, there is a fairly high level of unabsorbed inventory compared to historical averages.

Now that we have a sound understanding of where demand in the market is at current levels of supply, we can begin the fun work of estimating where it is going based on inventories under construction and construction times.


The Construction Overhang


In Canada, the pace of housing starts has mostly been higher than the pace of completions since 1995.  One of the chief effects of this incremental difference between starts and completions is that over time and by definition, inventory under construction has climbed to a level far higher than anything ever seen in the past:

There are two important structure notes to observe from this:

First, in Canada, when we talk about new housing, we are increasingly talking about apartments.  The ~320,000 units under construction make up a whopping 81.5% of the total inventory under construction, so even small changes to absorption patterns in that market have disproportionately large effects.

While single-detached housing makes up only ~10% of the new home market, it is still the most common housing type overall, and these homes play a major role in price-setting for the resale market. When new single family homes go unsold and there is downward pressure on prices, that pressure also affects the resale market.

We only need one more piece of data before we can wrap it up to make predictions, and that is understanding how long it will take for these units under construction to be completed.


Construction times


Ignoring the data blip of 1992-1993, construction times for every housing type have increased in a roughly linear fashion.  There are many reasons for this that we will likely write about in the future, because we feel it is a material contributor to the overall housing affordability crisis, but for now, the most important data is the 2025 average construction time for each housing type:

Applying these averages to the inventory under construction for each type, we can create a short-term forecast for completions.

Putting all this data together


When you apply average construction times to inventory under completion, you get the following:

Source: Data from CMHC Housing Market Information Portal, Forecast from Hawkeye Wealth

For rigour, we referenced actual housing start data so that we could more accurately estimate when this inventory would come online.

The upshot is that we anticipate two years of even higher levels of apartment completion.  For 2026, single-detached completions should fall with semi-detached completions also falling slightly. Row Housing will likely remain flat.

With current market absorption known and an estimate for future completions, we can finally get to the fun part, a picture of how far away each housing type is from reaching a bottom.


Unabsorbed Inventory Predictions


In short, we think that there will be slightly different ‘bottoms’ in Canada for each of the housing types:


1. Apartments - The market for completed apartment units has been the most resilient of all asset classes in Canada in recent years, but there are major caveats here. The pre-sale market, which is something of a canary in the coal mine, has been experiencing weakness for years.


The market has already demonstrated that it hasn’t been able to fully absorb the high number of completions from 2023-2025, and there are at least 2 more years of even higher completions coming. In our view, unless there is unexpectedly high demand growth, we are likely at least 2 years, and potentially 3-4 years from seeing a bottom as unabsorbed inventory will continue to grow and prices soften.


Verdict: A long way from the bottom


2. Row Houses
- Levels of unabsorbed inventory are comparatively high, and still rising. Row houses are expected to deliver a similar number of completions in 2026 as 2025, so we think that unabsorbed inventory will likely continue to grow and prices will soften. That said, the bottom here may only be 1-2 years off because a slowdown in building affects the market more quickly due to ~13 month construction times.

Verdict: Hasn’t bottomed, but is closer than apartments


3. Single-detached
- There isn’t strong demand for single-detached homes at current pricing, but 2026 projects lower completions than 2025, so there will be less pressure on unabsorbed inventory.  When you combine this with the fact that the UCR (the unsold inventory relative to number of completions) peaked for single-detached homes in 2024, there are signs that barring further economic weakness, unabsorbed inventory is likely to flatten or even drop slightly and prices may hold.

Two cautionary notes on Single-detached data:


a) There are high levels of regional variance in this category, so local research is particularly important.


b) While the market may be at or near the bottom, it is only because the building taps are being slowed, not because of improved demand, so it’s still highly vulnerable.


Verdict: Bottomed, and if it hasn’t, it’s close.


4. Semi-detached
- This is a hard category because it’s so small it can swing more wildly from year to year.  Demand is low for semi-detached, but like single-detached, the category will see fewer completions in 2026 than it did in 2025.  Also like single-detached, the UCR for semi-detached peaked in 2024.

Verdict: Bottomed, but with demand even more precarious than single-detached, it’s extremely vulnerable.


Conclusion


The combined factors of unabsorbed inventory, completions, inventory under construction and average construction time can provide an excellent indication of market health and positioning in a market cycle.  When unabsorbed inventories are high and likely to rise, prices are likely to fall.


Until more robust demand returns and the economy strengthens, the housing market will remain in a precarious balance, but finding a market "bottom" will not be uniform for each asset type nor across geographies.


For high-density condo projects, the correction phase appears far from over. Conversely, single-family and semi-detached segments are showing signs of stabilization, even if that stabilization is driven by lower supply rather than stronger demand.

Author

Hawkeye Wealth Ltd.

Date

April 9, 2026

Share

By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. March 15, 2026
“Development required multiple steps, and every step meant one more chance for something to go wrong.” - Sam Zell, Am I Being Too Subtle? Development isn’t for the faint of heart, but it can be rewarding when navigated with precision. While market demand and building costs set the foundation for any project, entitlement risk remains one of the most volatile development variables. To an outsider, entitlement feels like a binary "yes or no" outcome, but in reality, it is a graduated staircase of legislative and administrative hurdles where risk is systematically removed at every milestone. Since the passage of Bill 44 on November 30, 2023, the entitlement risk profile in BC has shifted. While a massive development slowdown has temporarily masked the benefits, the impact is structural. Public hearings, a major component of entitlement risk, are now prohibited for residential projects that align with an Official Community Plan (OCP). In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we examine the interaction between OCPs and Zoning Bylaws. We map out the legislative processes that a development goes through and the precise moments where entitlement risk ‘steps down’, information that a savvy investor can use to evaluate the risk and reward of a development deal at any stage of the process. OCP and Zoning Bylaw The interplay between an OCP and a Zoning Bylaw is a relationship of vision versus law. The OCP serves as a high-level, long-term strategic map that outlines the city’s future intent for land use, density, and community character in various areas of a City. However, it is the Zoning Bylaw that provides the granular, legally binding rules for every specific parcel of land, including permitted uses, height limits, and setbacks. For a development to proceed, s. 478 of the Local Government Act requires that its zoning must be consistent with the OCP. If a project aligns with the OCP’s vision but the underlying zoning does not yet allow for it, the Zoning Bylaw must be amended, though a public hearing is no longer required. If the project doesn’t align with the OCP however, it significantly increases the ‘height’ of the entitlement risk. The Entitlement Staircase When legislative hurdles are mapped onto a timeline, we see that the entitlement process is a series of discrete events where varying levels of risk come off the table at each step:
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. January 31, 2026
Introduction "It was never my thinking that made the big money for me. It was always my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight!" - Jesse Livermore “The big money is not in the buying and the selling, but in the waiting” - Charlie Munger It’s easy to feel unconfident as an investor today. We are currently operating in a market of ‘brittle optimism’, where major indices flirt with all-time highs while headlines warn of trade wars, a potential AI bubble burst, and the destabilization of institutions. For many people, the natural instinct in the face of volatility and future uncertainty is to protect what they have by taking defensive positions, hedging, or selling altogether until the future feels rosy again. But that doesn’t appear to be what the wealthy are doing. In this edition of the Bird’s Eye View, we consider the data from three wealth reports ( Tiger 21 , Knight Frank , and Capgemini ) to see how different cohorts of the wealthy are positioning their portfolios, and how their portfolio construction is changing in response to uncertainty. Asset Allocations by Investor Profile The table below represents the most recent reported weightings and rankings across the three major cohorts. Note that while Tiger 21 and Capgemini provide percentage-based portfolios, the Knight Frank data reflects rankings by weight within institutional family offices.
By Hawkeye Wealth Ltd. December 20, 2025
“The provincial government has provided local government with only two options to build infrastructure: development cost charges and property taxes. And I will always be on the side of property taxpayers, and we will look for developers and ‘growth to pay for growth’ as a principle.” - BC Mayor, Oct 9, 2024